sixth blog

The essay, “A Way With Words, or Away With Word: Effect of Texting and IMing on Language” by Timothy barranco was a great example of research paper. He used proper paraphrase such as a sentence that explains vernacular language system - “vernacular language systems, whether txt, Ebonics, or some other dialect of English, should be valued for adding to the standard English language and also for their cultural significance as they tie together regions and groups of people…”
Not only paraphrase but also quotation also used appropriately from resources. The reference from findings of Sali Tagliamonte and Derek Denis, that proves the bias of stereotypes about text usage statistically can be one of example – “the use of short forms, abbreviations, and emotional language is infinitesimally small, less than 3% of the data”. The writer primarily states common prejudice about effect of texting on language and shows why people think like that way. Also, he represents how other opinions stand differently. From such organized format, readers can think not only one view about effect of texting but also other ideas about it. Overall, to readers, this research gives a great contribution to break bias out and lets them understand texting is a creative tool to show potential in English language.

blog assignment

People don’t estimate winners and losers of history. The history itself does. For people who didn’t live at some era, they don’t know any truth, and the history showed how the time and people determines winners and losers. The Bush and the Obama doctrine can be shown as an example of loser and winner of history.People saying Obama doctrine is winner of history that is no-word needed. It cooperates with other countries in a peace, avoids meddling in the internal affairs of other countries. Also it follows balancing theory so even it uses a tactic of containment of threats, it keeps up US strength which is the most important purpose as maintain a country. As maintaining United States hegemony, compellence, influence internal politics of other countries and unilateralism, Bush doctrine was judged as loser’s doctrine. Even these two doctrines looked for same goal, how history divided as two parts?
History which can be define as a time moves continuously, also change its characteristic. It makes hard to people think what is good or bad. Because there was a point that loser of history could be regarded as a winner, part of the history also was written as if they were definite winner. This fact proves through existence of Realist and Liberalist. These two unlike respects proves how history can be shown differently and how winners and losers wrote history.